Investors have a rather straightforward wish list. The catch is, they want all of it filled at the beginning. And why not? Even the small firms read thousands of plans each year, and fund only a few. Larger firms see tens of thousands of plans each year, and fund only a few more. Yes, there is plenty of capital available, and a mad frenzy to invest it. But that doesn’t mean it is easy to score the capital.
A Unique Idea in an Empty Space
The time for building the generic tools, infrastructure and horizontal portals of the Internet is past. The players in these areas are in place and dominant. It is important to understand the current moment on the technology emergence curve to determine the viability of your new idea.
Investors want a unique idea in an empty or near-empty space. It’s OK to be second, if your competitor in first place has proven the market but not dominated it. Remember, in the Internet, there is only first and second place, nothing else. With all the new territory to explore, no investor needs to put his money on an also-ran in the making.
Once your unique idea has proven its empty space, it must be scalable. Except for tiny niche businesses grown in bedrooms and sold for modest amounts, the rule of thumb holds that the business must scale to at least $100 million in valuation in three to five years’ time. We have already forgotten the names of those that couldn’t. It will be interesting to see how many well-funded businesses actually achieve this $100 million goal.
Sometimes overlooked by CEOs, but not investors, your business idea must be clearly defensible. “First to market” is often the defense put up against non-defensibility. It is an excuse. Yes, first to market gives a distinct advantage in an arena where there is only first and second place for players. But first to market does not make your idea defensible. You can be bumped off by copycats who do it better with more capital and brand. You become the pio¬neer with the arrows in your back.
Recently, one Los Angeles venture group passed on a start-up company with an in-depth site, good traffic, deeply experienced entrepre¬neurial management, and an impressive projected R.O.I, all built on a small initial investment — because the competitor in the number one position could create the depth of the content already created by the start¬up, even though the competitor’s focus was elsewhere. Given the global exposure of the Internet and the low barriers to entry for new competitors, defensibility must be based on some proprietary technology, unique assets or licenses, or access to exclusive information, services or branding.
Here’s the catch-22: Investors tend not to fund companies that do not have a proven management team that can execute growth at the speed required to “flip” a company to a sale or IPO in the next few years. But without the capital, a company cannot attract the management team. It is critical to have the commitment of at least one executive with a proven track record in building an Internet business. Experience coupled with an entrepreneurial background is a big success with investors. Given the race to exit, there is no time for an executive’s learning curve.
Investors will support a management team that has had Internet experience within a corporate structure, but no entrepreneurial background. If this is you, it is helpful to align your start-up with an Internet-experienced consultant specializing in start-ups to strengthen the team.
Enough Money to Get the Job Done
Investors like to see business plans that ask for enough money to create critical mass, take first position and accelerate the company’s growth unhindered by a second, lengthy search for capital. So, make certain that you ask for enough money in the first round so as not to struggle during launch and initial market share. It is best to declare your search for both first and second rounds, to demonstrate that you understand the magnitude of money, particularly marketing money, required to take a significant position in this space.
There is no road map to capitalization in these uncharted territories. But sometimes the hand-drawn map will do.
Finally a smart blogger…I love how you’re thinking and writing!
Thank you! Glad you are enjoying it.
To begin with ,you have created a very beautiful theme . I think i might design something similar for a future project that i want to build . On top of that ,i really enjoy most of the posts and your unique point of view.Good Job
Thanks so much for your kind words — I’m glad you like the perspective and the material. Of course, use whatever you find as a template for your future projects.
have already been reading your blog around a few days. really love your posts. btw i will be doing report relating to this topic. do you happen to know other websites or perhaps online forums in which I can find out more? thanks a lot.
Katelyn ~ best of luck with your report, and thanks for your kind words. Glad you like the blog. For more information on these topics,I like Guy Kawasaki http://www.guykawasaki.com and Scott Allen http://www.thevirtualhandshake.com/scott-allen.html
This is really interesting, You are a very skilled blogger. I’ve joined your rss feed and look forward to seeking more of your great post. Also, I have shared your web site in my social networks!
Thanks for the follow and the kind words, and for sharing with your social network. And for commenting so I know about it!